EFFECT OF THERAPEUTIC ELECTRICAL STIMULATION ON PPTT IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS
RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19141/2237-3756.lifestyle.v7.n1.p26-33Keywords:
Electrical stimulation, physical therapy modalities, pain toleranceAbstract
The electrical stimulation (ES) modalities can be used to promote pain relief or to generate muscle strength. However, it is observed that there are few studies that analyze the Pressure Pain Tolerance Threshold (PPTT) in parameters that promote muscle strengthening. We aim to verify and compare PPTT after EE with parameters indicated for muscle strengthening in healthy patterns. For this, 51 women randomized into three groups participated (n = 17 each): RUSSIAN, AUSSIE and FES. ES was applied for 10 minutes with motor-level intensity to the right quadriceps muscle. The left quadriceps was used as a control. PPTT in the rectus femoris muscle was investigated by pressure algometry before, immediately after, 30 minutes after and 1 hour after electrostimulation. When compared to the control, the FES group shows a statistically significant increase in LTDP immediately after ES (p = 0.009), while the RUSSA group shows statistical difference 30 minutes after ES (p=0.007), but with a significant increase on the control side. In the AUSSIE group, there was no statistical difference between the sides in any of the evaluated hypotheses. Comparing the moments on the experimental side, the FES group shows a significant increase in PPTT immediately after and 30 minutes after ES (p=0.03). The other comparisons do not show independent differences. The data studied suggests that ES can increase PPTT through FES when parameters for muscular strengthening are applied.
Downloads
References
ALMEIDA, N.; PALADINI, L. H.; PIVOVARSKI, M.; GAIDESKI, F.; KORELO, R. I. G.; MACEDO, A. C. B. Immediate analgesic effect of 2KHz interferential current in chronic low back pain: randomized clinical trial. BrJP. v. 2, n. 1, p. 27 – 33, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5935/2595-0118.20190006
CAMBRIDGE, N.A. Electrical apparatus used in medicine before 1900. Procedures of the Royal Society of Medicine. v.70, n.9, p.635 – 641, 1977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003591577707000909
DAGTEKIN, O.; KÖNIG, E.; GERBERSHAGEN, H. J.; MARCUS, H.; SABATOWSKI, R.; PETZKE, F. Measuring pressure pain thresholds. Comparison of an electromechanically controlled algometer with established methods. Schmerz. v. 21, n. 5, p. 439 – 444, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-007-0544-5
DOUCET, B. M.; LAM, A.; GRIGGIN, L. Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Skeletal Muscle Function. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine. v. 85, n. 1, p. 201 – 215, 2012.
DOUNAVI, M. D.; CHESTERTON, L. S.; SIM, J. Effects of Interferential Therapy Parameter Combinations Upon Experimentally Induced Pain in Pain-Free Participants: A randomized Controlled Trial. American Physical Therapy Association. v. 92, n. 7, p. 911 – 923, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20110104
EGLOFF, N.; KLINGLER, N.; VON KÄNEL, R.; CÁMARA, R. J. A.; CURATOLO, M.; WEGMANN, B.; MARTI, E.; FERRARI, M. L. G. Algometry with a clothes peg compared to an electronic pressure algometer: a randomized cross-sectional study in pain patients. BMC Musculo skeletal Disorders. v. 12, p. 1471 – 2474, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-174
FISCHER, A.A.; Pressure algometry over normal muscles: standard values, validity and reproducibility of pressure threshold. Pain, v. 30, p. 115 – 126, 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(87)90089-3
FUENTES, J.; ARMIJO-OLIVO, S.; MAGEE, D. J.; GROSS, D. Does amplitude-modulated frequency have a role in the hypoalgesic response of interferential current on pressure pain sensitivity in healthy subjects? A randomized crossover study. Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. v. 96, n. 1, p. 22 – 29, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2009.06.009
FUKUDA, T.Y.; MARCONDES, F.B.; RABELO, N.A.; VASCONCELOS, R.A.; JUNIOR, C.C. Comparison of peak torque, intensity and discomfort generated by neuromuscular electrical stimulation of low and medium frequency. Isokinetics and ExerciseScience. v.21, p.167–173, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IES-130495
IMAMURA, M.; IMAMURA, S. T.; KAZIYAMA, H. H.; TARGINO, R. A.; HSING, W. T.; DE SOUZA, L. P.; CUTAIT, M. M.; FREGNI, F.; CAMANHO, G. L. Impact of nervous system hyperalgesia on pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a controlled analysis. Arthritis Rheum. v. 59, n. 10, p. 1424 – 1431, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24120
KITCHEN, S. Eletroterapia: prática baseada em evidências. 11. ed. Barueri: Manole; 2003.
LACOURT, T. E.; HOUTVEEN, J. H.; VAN DOORNEN, L. J. P. Experimental pressure – pain assessments: test – retest reliability, convergence and dimensionalyty. Scandinavian Journal of Pain. v. 3, n. 1, p. 31 – 37, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpain.2011.10.003
LIMA, L. V.; CRUZ, K.M.L.; ABNER, T.S.S.; MOTA, C.M.D.; AGRIPINO, M.E.J.; SANTANA-FILHO, V.J. Associating high intensity and modulated frequency of tens delays analgesic tolerance in rats. Eur J Pain, v.19, n. 3, p. 369 – 376, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.555
MORAN, F.; LEONARD, T.; HAWTHORNE, S.; HUGHES, C. M.; MCCRUM-GARDNER, E.; JOHNSON, M. I.; RAKEL, B. A.; SLUKA, K. A.; WALSH, D. M. Hypoalgesia in Response to Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) Depends on Stimulation Intensity. American Pain Society. v. 12, n. 8. p. 929 – 935, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2011.02.352
NELSON, R.M.; HAYES, K.W.; CURRIER, D.P. Eletroterapia Clínica. 1. ed. Barueri: Manole. 2003.
PECKHAM, P.H.; KNUTSON, J.S. Functional electrical stimulation for neuromuscular applications. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. v. 7, n. 1, p. 327–360, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bioeng.6.040803.140103
PIOVESAN, E. J.; TATSUI, C. E.; KOWACS, P. A.; LANGE, M. C.; PACHECO, C.; WERNECK, L. C. Utilização da algometria de pressão na determinação dos limiares de percepção dolorosa trigeminal em voluntários sadios: um novo protocolo de estudos. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. v. 59, n. 1, p. 92 – 96, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2001000100019
ROBERTSON, V.; WARD, A. R.; LOW, J.; REED, A. Eletroterapia explicada: princípios e prática. 4. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2011.
SILVA, B. C.; CORACINI, C. A.; BRANCO, C. L.; MICHELON, M. D.; BERTOLINI, G. R. F. Aussie current in students with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Pain. v. 1. n. 3, p. 202 – 206, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5935/2595-0118.20180040
VENANCIO, R. C.; PELEGRINI, S.; GOMES, D. Q.; NAKANO, E. Y.; LIEBANO, R. E. Effects of Carrier Frequency of Interferential Current on Pressure Pain Threshold and Sensory Comfort in Humans. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. v. 94, n. 1, p. 95 – 102, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.08.204
WARD, A.R.; OLIVER, W.G.; BUCCELLA, D. Wrist extensor torque production and discomfort associated with low-frequency and burst-modulated kilohertz-frequency currents. Physical Therapy. v. 86, n. 10, p. 1360 – 1367, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20050300
WARD, A.R.; ROBERTSON, V.J.; IOANNOU, H. The effect of duty cycle and frequency on muscle torque production using kilohertz frequency range alternating current. Med Eng Phys. v. 26, n. 7, p. 569 – 579, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.04.007
WARD, A.R.; SHKURATOVA, N. Russian electrical stimulation: the early experiments. Physical Therapy. v.82, n.10, p.1019 – 1030, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/82.10.1019
WARD, A. R.; CHUEN, W.L.H. Lowering of sensory, motor, and pain-tolerance thresholds With burst duration using kilohertz-frequency alternating current electric stimulation: part II. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. v. 90, n. 1, p. 1619 – 1627, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.02.022
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Life Style

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain copyright over their published works and grant the Journal of Interdisciplinary Lifestyle Studies the right of first publication.
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license permits third parties to share, copy, distribute, reproduce, adapt, transform, and create derivative works from the material for any purpose, including commercial purposes, provided that the following conditions are met:
- appropriate credit is given to the authors;
- the original source of publication is acknowledged;
- a link to the license is provided;
- any changes made to the content are clearly indicated;
- no suggestion is made that the authors or the journal endorse the use of the material.
The license does not waive the authors’ moral rights and does not authorize the use of third-party materials that are not covered by the article’s license.
Authors may enter into additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version, including deposit in institutional repositories, publication in books, dissemination on personal websites, and use for academic purposes, provided that the original publication in the journal is properly acknowledged.
By submitting and publishing the manuscript, the authors declare that they have the necessary rights to license the content and that any images, tables, instruments, datasets, or other third-party materials have been used with appropriate permission or in accordance with applicable legal limitations.
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International



